Chuck vs Sawyer
Side-by-side comparison of Chuck (6 River Systems, Inc.) and Sawyer (Rethink Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Chuckcobot6 River Systems, Inc.—Trust Score | SawyercobotRethink Robotics 13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available | 2015 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | — | US$34,900 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 90.7 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 4,100 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 19 kg |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, UL, CSA | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | — | $34,900 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
Chuck vs Sawyer compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.