Skip to content
Robolist.ai

AP002 Air Nippers Modules vs piCLASSIC™ Neo

Side-by-side comparison of AP002 Air Nippers Modules (ACY Automation Inc.) and piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved
AP002 Air Nippers ModulesAP002 Air Nippers ModulescobotACY Automation Inc.
Trust Score
piCLASSIC™ NeopiCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab
Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)TW
Year First Available (values differ)2025
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Mounting Options (values differ)flush mounting, direct mount, End-of-Arm-Tooling
IP Rating (values differ)IP66
Safety
Safety Rating (values differ)CE
Duty Cycle (values differ)24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable (values differ)Yes
End-Effector
Tool Changer Support (values differ)manual
Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ)Yes
Wrist Power Supply (values differ)compressed air
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible (values differ)No
Digital Twin Support (values differ)Yes

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Programming Interface, Tool Flange Standard, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

AP002 Air Nippers Modules vs piCLASSIC™ Neo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.