AUBO i系列 vs HIWIN SCARA RS series
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO i系列 (遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司) and HIWIN SCARA RS series (HIWIN Technologies Corp. — Automation Systems Division) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 AUBO i系列cobot遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司—Trust Score |  HIWIN SCARA RS seriescobotHIWIN Technologies Corp. — Automation Systems Division—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 6 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 886.5 mm | 1,869 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 4 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.02 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 2.8 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 24 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | any_angle | floor, ceiling, wall |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | CE |
| Force/Torque Sensing | Yes | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
AUBO i系列 vs HIWIN SCARA RS series compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.