Canadarm2 vs M-950
Side-by-side comparison of Canadarm2 (MDA Space) and M-950 (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Canadarm2industrial-armMDA Space0.0Trust Score |  M-950industrial-armFANUC10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2001 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 116,000 kg | 500 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 17,000 mm | 2,830 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.1 mm |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | — | IP67/IP54 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | R-30iB |
| Commercial | ||
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | 17 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time
About this comparison
Canadarm2 vs M-950 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.