海纳系列移动式协作机器人 vs TIAGo Base
Side-by-side comparison of 海纳系列移动式协作机器人 (遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司) and TIAGo Base (PAL Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 海纳系列移动式协作机器人amr-warehouse遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司—Trust Score |  TIAGo Baseamr-warehousePAL Robotics6.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 316 kg | 70 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | lidar slam |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Year First Available, Price Range (USD), AMR Subtype, Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
海纳系列移动式协作机器人 vs TIAGo Base compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.