Skip to content
Robolist.ai

Denso Cobotta PRO 1300 vs piCLASSIC™ Neo

Side-by-side comparison of Denso Cobotta PRO 1300 (DENSO) and piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved
Denso Cobotta PRO 1300Denso Cobotta PRO 1300cobotDENSO
Trust Score
piCLASSIC™ NeopiCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab
Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)JP
Year First Available (values differ)2025
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Payload (values differ)12 kg
Reach (values differ)1,300 mm
Degrees of Freedom (values differ)6
Repeatability (values differ)±0.04 mm
Max TCP Speed (values differ)2.5 m/s
Robot Weight (values differ)41 kg
Mounting Options (values differ)inline, floor-mounted
IP Rating (values differ)IP54
Safety
Safety Rating (values differ)ISO 10218-1:2011, ISO 13849-1:2015, ISO/TS 15066:2016
Force/Torque Sensing (values differ)Yes
Ease of Use
Programming Interface (values differ)teach_pendant, drag_and_drop

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

Denso Cobotta PRO 1300 vs piCLASSIC™ Neo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.