Magician Lite vs TM16M
Side-by-side comparison of Magician Lite (Shenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd.) and TM16M (Techman Robot Inc. (subsidiary of Quanta Computer)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Magician LitecobotShenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  TM16McobotTechman Robot Inc. (subsidiary of Quanta Computer)—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | — | US$40,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.3 kg | 16 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 340 mm | 917 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 4 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.02 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 1.3 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 2.4 kg | 32 kg |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | ISO 10218-1:2011, ISO/TS 15066:2016 |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | code_python | no_code_gui, drag_and_drop |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | RS232, Modbus TCP/RTU, PROFINET, EtherNet/IP |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | — | $40,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Mounting Options, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
Magician Lite vs TM16M compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.