Doosan A0509 vs piCLASSIC™ Neo
Side-by-side comparison of Doosan A0509 (Doosan Robotics Inc.) and piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Doosan A0509cobotDoosan Robotics Inc.—Trust Score |  piCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | KR | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 900 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 15 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall, rail | flush mounting, direct mount, End-of-Arm-Tooling |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | Cat4 PLe | CE |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | wrist external | — |
| Duty Cycle | 24 7 continuous | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 | — |
| Tool Changer Support | manual | manual |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic | compressed air |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, .NET | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | ModbusTCP, ModbusRTU, PROFINET IO, EtherNet/IP | — |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Doosan A0509 vs piCLASSIC™ Neo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.