A0509s vs piCLASSIC™ Neo
Side-by-side comparison of A0509s (Doosan Robotics Inc.) and piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 A0509scobotDoosan Robotics Inc.—Trust Score |  piCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | KR | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 900 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 21 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | inline, floor-mounted |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | PL e Cat 4 | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Profinet | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month
About this comparison
A0509s vs piCLASSIC™ Neo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.