KR 500 R2800-2 HI vs R-Safe RFID
Side-by-side comparison of KR 500 R2800-2 HI (KUKA) and R-Safe RFID (ReeR) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
| KR 500 R2800-2 HIindustrial-armKUKA —Trust Score |  R-Safe RFIDindustrial-armReeR—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (values differ) | — | 12-25 |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat. 4 PLe |
| Safety I/O Pairs (values differ) | — | 2 |
| E-Stop Response (values differ) | — | 55 ms |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Dual Check Safety, Safe Zone Count, Controller Model, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
KR 500 R2800-2 HI vs R-Safe RFID compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.