LBR iisy cobot vs TQ HPR 120S
Side-by-side comparison of LBR iisy cobot (KUKA) and TQ HPR 120S (TQ-Group) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 LBR iisy cobotcobotKUKA10.0Trust Score |  TQ HPR 120ScobotTQ-Group—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2012 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 15 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,300 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 3.9 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Angle, Ceiling, Floor, Wall | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, ISO/TS 15066 | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, code_ros | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
LBR iisy cobot vs TQ HPR 120S compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.