M-100 vs TIAGo Base
Side-by-side comparison of M-100 (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) and TIAGo Base (PAL Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
—Trust Score |  TIAGo Baseamr-warehousePAL Robotics6.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 12 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | 2,000 kg | 70 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 4.5 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | — | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Reach, IP Rating
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
M-100 vs TIAGo Base compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.