M3 XBots vs TQ-HPR50
Side-by-side comparison of M3 XBots (Planar Motor) and TQ-HPR50 (TQ-Group) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 M3 XBotscobotPlanar Motor—Trust Score |  TQ-HPR50cobotTQ-Group—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.001 mm | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 3 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 1.8 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, wall, custom | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP69K | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | PLC Interface via PROFINET, EtherCAT, POWERLINK, EtherNet/IP[4] | no_code_gui |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | All common fieldbus systems | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, Safety Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
M3 XBots vs TQ-HPR50 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.