myCobot 280 vs Ultra-Lightweight Portable Collaborative Robot
Side-by-side comparison of myCobot 280 (Elephant Robotics) and Ultra-Lightweight Portable Collaborative Robot (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 myCobot 280cobotElephant Robotics16.7Trust Score |  Ultra-Lightweight Portable Collaborative RobotcobotFANUC—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2020 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$449 | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.3 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 280 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 0.9 kg | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $449 | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Safety Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Programming Interface, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
myCobot 280 vs Ultra-Lightweight Portable Collaborative Robot compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.