Skip to content
Robolist.ai

piCLASSIC™ Neo vs piCOBOT®

Side-by-side comparison of piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) and piCOBOT® (Piab USA Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved
piCLASSIC™ NeopiCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab
Trust Score
piCOBOT®piCOBOT®cobotPiab USA Inc.
Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)Sweden
Year First Available (values differ)2025
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Payload (values differ)7 kg
Mounting Options (values differ)flush mounting, direct mount, End-of-Arm-Toolingflexible
IP Rating (values differ)IP65
Safety
Safety Rating (values differ)CEIP65
Duty Cycle (values differ)24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable (values differ)Yes
Programming Interface (values differ)no_code_gui, proprietary_app
End-Effector
Tool Changer Support (values differ)manual
Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ)Yes
Wrist Power Supply (values differ)compressed air
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible (values differ)No
Digital Twin Support (values differ)Yes

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

piCLASSIC™ Neo vs piCOBOT® compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.