Skip to content
Robolist.ai

piCLASSIC™ Neo vs xMate 本体集成控制器

Side-by-side comparison of piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) and xMate 本体集成控制器 (Beijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved
piCLASSIC™ NeopiCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab
Trust Score
xMate 本体集成控制器xMate 本体集成控制器cobotBeijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.
6.7Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)CN
Year First Available (values differ)2025
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Payload (values differ)20 kg
Reach (values differ)1,798 mm
Degrees of Freedom (values differ)7
Repeatability (values differ)±0.1 mm
Max TCP Speed (values differ)4 m/s
Robot Weight (values differ)161 kg
Mounting Options (values differ)inline, floor-mounted
IP Rating (values differ)IP67
Safety
Safety Rating (values differ)ISO 13849-1:2015, TÜV
Force/Torque Sensing (values differ)joint level all
Ease of Use
Programming Interface (values differ)visual_block
End-Effector
Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ)Yes
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols (values differ)TCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Profinet, Ethernet/IP

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

piCLASSIC™ Neo vs xMate 本体集成控制器 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.