Skip to content
Robolist.ai

piCLASSIC™ Neo vs xMate SR

Side-by-side comparison of piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) and xMate SR (Beijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved
piCLASSIC™ NeopiCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab
Trust Score
xMate SRxMate SRcobotBeijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.
10.0Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)CN
Year First Available (values differ)2025
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Payload (values differ)5 kg
Reach (values differ)919 mm
Degrees of Freedom (values differ)6
Repeatability (values differ)±0.03 mm
Robot Weight (values differ)16.5 kg
Mounting Options (values differ)inline, floor-mountedAll directions
IP Rating (values differ)IP67
Safety
Safety Rating (values differ)TÜV
Force/Torque Sensing (values differ)joint level all
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable (values differ)Yes
Programming Interface (values differ)teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, proprietary_app
End-Effector
Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ)Yes
Wrist Power Supply (values differ)48VDC
Reliability
MTBF (values differ)80,000 hrs

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

piCLASSIC™ Neo vs xMate SR compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.