Quince vs Starship Delivery Robot
Side-by-side comparison of Quince (Chiba Institute of Technology and Tohoku University) and Starship Delivery Robot (Starship Technologies) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
| QuincedeliveryChiba Institute of Technology and Tohoku University 10.0Trust Score |  Starship Delivery RobotdeliveryStarship Technologies29.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 18 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 10 kg |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 38 kg |
| Dimensions (values differ) | — | 697x569x571 |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | — | enclosed locked |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | — | lidar slam,vision,hybrid |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1.8 m/s |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 61 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 18 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Integration | ||
| Fleet Management (values differ) | — | centralized cloud |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | — | hard floor |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Tray Count, Tray Capacity, IP Rating, Min Passable Width, Min Object Detection Height, Charge Time, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Noise Level, Display Size, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty
About this comparison
Quince vs Starship Delivery Robot compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.