Skip to content
Robolist.ai

SOTO vs TIAGo Base

Side-by-side comparison of SOTO (Jungheinrich) and TIAGo Base (PAL Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved
SOTOSOTOamr-warehouseJungheinrich
6.7Trust Score
TIAGo BaseTIAGo Baseamr-warehousePAL Robotics
6.7Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ)8 hrs10 hrs
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload & Form Factor
Payload (values differ)240 kg70 kg
AMR Subtype (values differ)other
Turning Radius (values differ)0 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type (values differ)lidar slamlidar slam
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ)245 °

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Length, Width, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

SOTO vs TIAGo Base compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.