Are you a robotics manufacturer?
Claim your page to correct your specs and keep your listing current.
Flexiv is a robotics company founded 2016, based in China, developing 6 robots primarily in the Cobot category.
CAPITAL & EVIDENCE
Flexiv has raised US$100.0M across 1 confirmed round and has no deployment evidence on file.
Raised
US$100.0M
across 1 confirmed round · latest Dec 2020 · Series B
- Dec 2020· Series B· US$100.0M· investors: Meituan, Meta Capital, New Hope Group +5 more· The Robot Report ↗· 6 outletsCorrect this round
Confirmed rounds recorded from January 2017. Every amount links to its source.
Correct this →Shipped
No deployment evidence on file
A deployment is recorded when a public source names both the customer and the robot, or the maker confirms it. Nothing here counts against Flexiv.
In Collaborative Robot, Universal Robots A/S, FANUC and Kassow Robots ApS have deployment evidence on file.
Add a deployment →General-purpose adaptive robots for intelligent automation
Flexiv develops and manufactures adaptive robotic arms and related automation products, including the Rizon series and Moonlight parallel robot, with force control, computer vision, and AI for tasks such as assembly, plugging, and surface processing. Its business is aimed at industrial automation customers across automotive, electronics, and other manufacturing sectors, with operations in China, the U.S., Singapore, and Germany.
Company facts
- Legal name
- Flexiv Ltd.
- HQ
- Shanghai, China
- Founded
- 2016 · 10 yrs
- Employees
- 120
- Stage
- Series B · Dec 2020
- Website
- www.flexiv.com
RoboScore
64.35 RoboScore + 5.43 Momentum· Strong evidence
Products 65%, Depth 5%, Evidence 30% set the number, and every rated company has all three. Attention has no weight of its own — it is one of the two things Evidence is built from, and it can only ever add. Activity and Readiness describe the brand but never move it. A value we don't have reads —, never zero. Momentum is independently collected news coverage, worth at most 15 points and never a deduction — a maker we have heard nothing about keeps its full RoboScore. Claiming or paying moves nothing.
6 of 6 factors known. How it's calculated
On the company boards
- #34 of 142·Cobot·best robot 57.28 + depth 2.64 + news 5.43 = total 65.35
A board total ranks makers within one category. It is built from the best robot's RoboScore, a capped credit for more ranked robots, and news. It is not this company's RoboIndex above. How boards work
Awards & recognition
- Red Dot: Best of the Best2022businesswire.com ↗
Milestones
Company founded by a core team from Stanford robotics and AI labs.
Press coverage
- Flexiv Robotics - Plugandplaytechcenter
Plug and Play Tech Center
- Flexiv - Wikipedia
Wikipedia
In the news
8 events · last 90 days
+5.43momentumof 15 maxFlexiv Robotics Showcases Rizon 4S in NVIDIA Collaboration on Complex Assembly
In the news
8 events · last 90 days
Why Flexiv has been in the news, across 3 outlets — collected and classified independently, so a maker cannot add to it. It never changes a robot's RoboScore — the evidence half of the RoboIndex — and it can move a robot up a board by at most 15 points.
Public loss record
We read both of China’s national recall registers end to end — 2,426 notices. Four name a robot, all drones. Chinese registers are built around vehicles and household goods, so a blank record is weak evidence either way.
Active products by Flexiv
6 shown| # | Category | Key specs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | Moonlight parallel robot | Industrial Arm | Reach 1.2 m·Payload 38 kg | $32.5K | 2016 | 61.5 |
| 2 |  | Rizon 4 | Cobot | Payload 4 kg·Reach 919 mm | — | 2016 | 60.9 |
| 3 |  | Rizon 10 | Cobot | Payload 10 kg·Reach 1 m | — | 2016 | 60.0 |
| 4 |  | Rizon 4 + F/T Sensor | Cobot | Payload 4 kg·Reach 876 mm | — | 2021 | 57.3 |
| 5 |  | Rizon 4s | Cobot | Payload 4 kg·Reach 919 mm | — | — | 54.7 |
| 6 | Rizon 10 + F/T Sensor | Cobot | Payload 10 kg·Reach 941 mm | — | — | 53.1 |
Collaborative Robot buying guides
Industry Knowledge →
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
A structured set of questions for cobot vendor evaluations — covering cycle-time validation, reference site access, software update policies, EOAT ecosystem dep…
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
A structured 90-day cobot pilot in a manual line requires baseline measurement before day one, a named owner, cycle-time validation before PO signature, and wri…
Use Cases Where Cobots Fail: High-Payload, High-Speed, and Dirty Environments
Three categories of production environment actively defeat cobot economics: high-speed cycle-time applications, payloads above 20 kg, and environments with chip…