Are you a robotics manufacturer?
Claim your page to correct your specs and keep your listing current.
Wuhan Kudat Industry & Trade is a robotics company founded 1990, developing 1 robot primarily in the Commercial Cleaning category.
CAPITAL & EVIDENCE
Shipped
No deployment evidence on file
A deployment is recorded when a public source names both the customer and the robot, or the maker confirms it. Nothing here counts against Wuhan Kudat Industry & Trade.
In Commercial Cleaning, Gausium, Tennant and Avidbots have deployment evidence on file.
Add a deployment →Company facts
- Legal name
- Wuhan Kudat Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
- Founded
- 1990 · 36 yrs
RoboScore
48.33 RoboScore + 0.00 Momentum· Adequate evidence
Products 65%, Depth 5%, Evidence 30% set the number, and every rated company has all three. Attention has no weight of its own — it is one of the two things Evidence is built from, and it can only ever add. Activity and Readiness describe the brand but never move it. A value we don't have reads —, never zero. Momentum is independently collected news coverage, worth at most 15 points and never a deduction — a maker we have heard nothing about keeps its full RoboScore. Claiming or paying moves nothing.
5 of 6 factors known. How it's calculated
Active products by Wuhan Kudat Industry & Trade
1 shown| # | Category | Key specs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | Neo | Commercial Cleaning | Runtime 4 hr | $14.5K | 2025 | 55.9 |
Commercial Cleaning buying guides
Industry Knowledge →
Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting
Autonomous floor scrubber vendors compete hard on demo performance and compete poorly on SLA specificity, fleet data quality, and what happens when the machine …
Operator training: the line item most facilities skip
Cleaning robot deployments regularly underperform in year one not because the machine fails, but because operators weren't trained to get the most out of it. Th…
Cleaning robot vs. supervisor-led human team: side-by-side
The robot vs. human comparison is almost always framed by vendors as a cost question. It's not. It's a capability question first, then a cost question. Here's t…