2.1m High Robot vs QTrobot
Side-by-side comparison of 2.1m High Robot (Guangzhou Funspace Technology Co., Ltd.) and QTrobot (LuxAI) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 2.1m High RobothumanoidGuangzhou Funspace Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  QTrobothumanoidLuxAI13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$3,000 | US$7,476 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 2520 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 150 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | anthropomorphic torso |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 275 TOPS |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | Llama-2, Vicuna-13B |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, code_ros, no_code_gui |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, JavaScript |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 vendor |
| Open API (values differ) | — | open rest |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $3,000 | $7,476 |
| Price Tier | 20-40K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $11,900 |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | amusement, entertainment | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Total DOF, Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
2.1m High Robot vs QTrobot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.