2.1m High Robot vs Reachy Mini
Side-by-side comparison of 2.1m High Robot (Guangzhou Funspace Technology Co., Ltd.) and Reachy Mini (Pollen Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 2.1m High RobothumanoidGuangzhou Funspace Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  Reachy MinihumanoidPollen Robotics13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$3,000 | US$449 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 2520 mm | 28 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | 150 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | anthropomorphic torso |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 1 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Raspberry 4 Compute Module |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Raspberry Pi CM4 |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | web_interface |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | tethered |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | Unity, WebGL |
| Open API (values differ) | — | open rest websocket |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Noise Level (values differ) | — | 40 dB |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $3,000 | $449 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $299 |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 3 mo |
| Applications (values differ) | amusement, entertainment | research, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, RaaS / Month, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
2.1m High Robot vs Reachy Mini compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.