AE 3c vs TQ HPR40
Side-by-side comparison of AE 3c (AE Robotics Co., Ltd.) and TQ HPR40 (TQ-Systems GmbH) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
| AE 3ccobotAE Robotics Co., Ltd. 44.5Trust Score |  TQ HPR40cobotTQ-Systems GmbH46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $2,000 | $949 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 1.2 kg |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, CCC | CE, UL |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, proprietary_app | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,000 | $949 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Max TCP Speed, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
About this comparison
AE 3c vs TQ HPR40 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.