Aerospace Component Handler vs xMate CR35
Side-by-side comparison of Aerospace Component Handler (Violin Technologies) and xMate CR35 (Beijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Aerospace Component Handler—
xMate CR35CN
Year First Available
- Aerospace Component Handler—
- xMate CR352025
Verified Deployments
- Aerospace Component Handler0 Deployments
- xMate CR350 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- Aerospace Component HandlerACTIVE
- xMate CR35ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Degrees of Freedom
- Aerospace Component Handler7
- xMate CR356
Repeatability
- Aerospace Component Handler±0.03 mm
- xMate CR35—
Mounting Options
- Aerospace Component Handlerfloor/ceiling
- xMate CR35—
Safety
Force/Torque Sensing
- Aerospace Component Handler—
- xMate CR35Yes
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- Aerospace Component Handlerdrag_and_drop, code_python
- xMate CR35—
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- Aerospace Component HandlerYes
- xMate CR35—
| Aerospace Component HandlercobotViolin Technologies 18.6Trust Score | xMate CR35cobotBeijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd. 34.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor/ceiling | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | drag_and_drop, code_python | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating, Safety Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
Aerospace Component Handler vs xMate CR35 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.