AR-600 vs HRP-4C
Side-by-side comparison of AR-600 (Android Technologies) and HRP-4C (AIST) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 AR-600humanoidAndroid Technologies10.0Trust Score |  HRP-4ChumanoidAIST10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2008 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1475 mm | 158 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 56 kg | 46 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.6 m/s | 0.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | static walk |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 0.5 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 36 | 42 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 10 | 6 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 5 | 2 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | independent |
| Tool Use (values differ) | — | none |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | MediaTek MT8781 (2*A76 2.2GHz+6*A55 2.0GHz) | Intel Pentium M 1.6 GHz |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | MediaTek MT8781 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | single task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | motion_capture |
| Programming (values differ) | — | motion_capture, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | — | none |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | motion_capture, teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | none |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | OpenHRP3 |
| Open API (values differ) | — | closed |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP67 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, logistics_management | entertainment, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AR-600 vs HRP-4C compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.