AUBO-i20协作机器人 vs M3 XBots
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20协作机器人 (遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司) and M3 XBots (Planar Motor) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 AUBO-i20协作机器人cobot遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司—Trust Score |  M3 XBotscobotPlanar Motor—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 20 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 3 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | ±0.001 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | 3 m/s |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | floor, wall, custom |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP69K |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, visual_block, code_python | PLC Interface via PROFINET, EtherCAT, POWERLINK, EtherNet/IP[4] |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | All common fieldbus systems |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, Robot Weight, Safety Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
AUBO-i20协作机器人 vs M3 XBots compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.