AUBO-iS35协作机器人 vs myCobot 280
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-iS35协作机器人 (遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司) and myCobot 280 (Elephant Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 AUBO-iS35协作机器人cobot遨博（北京）智能科技股份有限公司—Trust Score |  myCobot 280cobotElephant Robotics16.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | — | US$449 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 0.3 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 280 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 4 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 0.9 kg |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop, visual_block, code_python | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | — | $449 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Safety Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
AUBO-iS35协作机器人 vs myCobot 280 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.