Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR) vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR) (Koops) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)—
TORUDE
Year First Available
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)—
TORU2016
Verified Deployments
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)0 Deployments
TORU0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)8 hrs
TORU9 hrs
Availability Status
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)ACTIVE
TORUACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)1,500 kg
TORU95 kg
Length
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)—
TORU102.4 mm
Width
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)—
TORU66.9 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)slam slam
TORUperception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
Commercial
Warranty
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR)—
TORU1 yrs
27.9Trust Score | TORUamr-warehouseMagazino55.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 95 kg |
| Length (values differ) | — | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 66.9 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam slam | perception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), AMR Subtype, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMR) vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.