BHR-5 vs Hubo 2
Side-by-side comparison of BHR-5 (Beijing Institute of Technology) and Hubo 2 (KAIST) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 BHR-5humanoidBeijing Institute of Technology10.0Trust Score |  Hubo 2humanoidKAIST13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | KR |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2012 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$700,000 | US$400,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1650 mm | 1250 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 65 kg | 55 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.6 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 30 | 40 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Control unit for walking and other functions; Processing unit for audio and video, wireless network. | Two PC/104 embedded computers with solid-state drives |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $700,000 | $400,000 |
| Price Tier | 150K+ | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | teleoperation | robotics education, research, service robotics, disaster response |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
BHR-5 vs Hubo 2 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.