BLDC Φ35 vs ECR5-900
Side-by-side comparison of BLDC Φ35 (엠닉스) and ECR5-900 (EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-900CN
Verified Deployments
BLDC Φ350 Deployments
ECR5-9000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
BLDC Φ35Contact for quote
ECR5-900$8,000
Availability Status
BLDC Φ35ACTIVE
ECR5-900ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-900±0.03 mm
IP Rating (Arm)
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-900IP54, IP40
Reach
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-900928 mm
Payload
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-9005 kg
Degrees of Freedom
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-9006
Robot Weight
BLDC Φ35—
ECR5-90020.5 kg
Commercial
Price (USD)
BLDC Φ35Contact for quote
ECR5-900$8,000
BLDC Φ35industrial-arm엠닉스0.0Trust Score | ECR5-900industrial-armEFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.48.6Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $8,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | ±0.03 mm |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54, IP40 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | 928 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | — | 5 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 20.5 kg |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $8,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Controller Model, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
BLDC Φ35 vs ECR5-900 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.