COBOTTA vs CRA-IP68 Series
Side-by-side comparison of COBOTTA (DENSO) and CRA-IP68 Series (Shenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
COBOTTAJP- CRA-IP68 SeriesCN
Year First Available
- COBOTTA2017
- CRA-IP68 Series—
Verified Deployments
- COBOTTA0 Deployments
- CRA-IP68 Series0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- COBOTTAContact for quote
- CRA-IP68 Series$18,900
Availability Status
- COBOTTAACTIVE
- CRA-IP68 SeriesACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Degrees of Freedom
- COBOTTA6
- CRA-IP68 Series—
Repeatability
- COBOTTA±0.1 mm
- CRA-IP68 Series—
Mounting Options
- COBOTTAfloor, ceiling
- CRA-IP68 Series—
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- COBOTTAteach_pendant, proprietary_app
- CRA-IP68 Series—
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- COBOTTAEtherCAT, Profinet
- CRA-IP68 Series—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- COBOTTAContact for quote
- CRA-IP68 Series$18,900
| COBOTTAcobotDENSO 43.3Trust Score | CRA-IP68 SeriescobotShenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd. 30.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | JP | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $18,900 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, proprietary_app | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Profinet | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $18,900 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating, Safety Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
COBOTTA vs CRA-IP68 Series compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.