CR 30H vs UR16e
Side-by-side comparison of CR 30H (Shenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd.) and UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CR 30HCN
UR16eDK
Year First Available
- CR 30H—
- UR16e2019
Verified Deployments
- CR 30H0 Deployments
- UR16e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- CR 30H$36,900–$38,900
- UR16eContact for quote
Availability Status
- CR 30HACTIVE
- UR16eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Degrees of Freedom
- CR 30H—
- UR16e6
Max TCP Speed
- CR 30H0.3 m/s
- UR16e—
Safety
Safety Rating
- CR 30H—
- UR16eCE, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- CR 30H—
- UR16ejoint level all
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- CR 30H—
- UR16e1 hrs
No-Code Capable
- CR 30H—
- UR16eYes
Programming Interface
- CR 30H—
- UR16eteach_pendant, drag_and_drop
Commercial
Price (USD)
- CR 30H$36,900–$38,900
- UR16eContact for quote
| CR 30HcobotShenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd. 12.9Trust Score | UR16ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne) 59.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $36,900–$38,900 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | joint level all |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $36,900–$38,900 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Repeatability, Robot Weight, Mounting Options, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
CR 30H vs UR16e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.