CR 30H vs UR3e
Side-by-side comparison of CR 30H (Shenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd.) and UR3e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CR 30HCN
UR3eDK
Year First Available
- CR 30H—
- UR3e2018
Verified Deployments
- CR 30H0 Deployments
- UR3e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- CR 30H$36,900–$38,900
- UR3eContact for quote
Availability Status
- CR 30HACTIVE
- UR3eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Max TCP Speed
- CR 30H0.3 m/s
- UR3e—
Mounting Options
- CR 30H—
- UR3etable, workstation
Safety
Safety Rating
- CR 30H—
- UR3eCE, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- CR 30H—
- UR3ejoint level partial
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- CR 30H—
- UR3e1 hrs
No-Code Capable
- CR 30H—
- UR3eYes
Programming Interface
- CR 30H—
- UR3eteach_pendant
Commercial
Price (USD)
- CR 30H$36,900–$38,900
- UR3eContact for quote
| CR 30HcobotShenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd. 12.9Trust Score | UR3ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne) —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $36,900–$38,900 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | — | table, workstation |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | joint level partial |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | teach_pendant |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $36,900–$38,900 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Robot Weight, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
CR 30H vs UR3e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.