ECR5-900 vs KR 50 R2500 HO
Side-by-side comparison of ECR5-900 (EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and KR 50 R2500 HO (KUKA Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
ECR5-900CN- KR 50 R2500 HODE
Verified Deployments
- ECR5-9000 Deployments
- KR 50 R2500 HO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- ECR5-900$8,000
- KR 50 R2500 HOContact for quote
Availability Status
- ECR5-900ACTIVE
- KR 50 R2500 HOACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
- ECR5-900±0.03 mm
- KR 50 R2500 HO—
IP Rating (Arm)
- ECR5-900IP54, IP40
- KR 50 R2500 HO—
Reach
- ECR5-900928 mm
- KR 50 R2500 HO—
Payload
- ECR5-9005 kg
- KR 50 R2500 HO—
Degrees of Freedom
- ECR5-9006
- KR 50 R2500 HO6
Robot Weight
- ECR5-90020.5 kg
- KR 50 R2500 HO—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ECR5-900$8,000
- KR 50 R2500 HOContact for quote
| ECR5-900industrial-armEFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. 48.6Trust Score | KR 50 R2500 HOindustrial-armKUKA Robotics 29.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $8,000 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | IP54, IP40 | — |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 928 mm | — |
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 20.5 kg | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $8,000 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Controller Model, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
ECR5-900 vs KR 50 R2500 HO compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.