ECR5-900 vs M 18 HVLP
Side-by-side comparison of ECR5-900 (EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and M 18 HVLP (Krautzberger) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
ECR5-900CN
M 18 HVLPDE
Verified Deployments
- ECR5-9000 Deployments
- M 18 HVLP0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- ECR5-900$8,000
- M 18 HVLPContact for quote
Availability Status
- ECR5-900ACTIVE
- M 18 HVLPACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
IP Rating (Arm)
- ECR5-900IP54, IP40
- M 18 HVLP—
Payload
- ECR5-9005 kg
- M 18 HVLP—
Reach
- ECR5-900928 mm
- M 18 HVLP—
Degrees of Freedom
- ECR5-9006
- M 18 HVLP—
Repeatability
- ECR5-900±0.03 mm
- M 18 HVLP—
Robot Weight
- ECR5-90020.5 kg
- M 18 HVLP—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ECR5-900$8,000
- M 18 HVLPContact for quote
| ECR5-900industrial-armEFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. 48.6Trust Score | M 18 HVLPindustrial-armKrautzberger —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $8,000 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP54, IP40 | — |
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 5 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 928 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 20.5 kg | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $8,000 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Controller Model, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
ECR5-900 vs M 18 HVLP compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.