ELYX-150 vs HC-Series
Side-by-side comparison of ELYX-150 (Eta Electronics) and HC-Series (Yaskawa) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
 ELYX-150cobotEta Electronics—Trust Score |  HC-SeriescobotYaskawa—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | JP |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 8.3 kg | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP66 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | KC | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | joint level all |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | teach_pendant, hand_guided |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | RS232, RS485, USB | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Mounting Options, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
ELYX-150 vs HC-Series compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.