Eva vs Reachy Mini
Side-by-side comparison of Eva (Hanson Robotics) and Reachy Mini (Pollen Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 EvahumanoidHanson Robotics10.0Trust Score |  Reachy MinihumanoidPollen Robotics13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | France |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$23,000 | US$449 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 167 mm | 28 cm |
| Weight (values differ) | 9.5 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | static |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.6 kg | 1 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 83 | 6 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 15 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX | Raspberry 4 Compute Module |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Intel i7 | Raspberry Pi CM4 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | cloud only | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | web_interface |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, code_python | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | tethered |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | visual_block, code_python | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | ros2 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | Unity, WebGL |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | open rest websocket |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP20 | — |
| Noise Level (values differ) | — | 40 dB |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $23,000 | $449 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | pre-order | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $299 |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 3 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research | research, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, MTBF, Task Success Rate, RaaS / Month, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Eva vs Reachy Mini compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.