EVO Nest vs TORU
Side-by-side comparison of EVO Nest (Autel Robotics) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
EVO NestCN
TORUDE
Year First Available
- EVO Nest—
- TORU2016
Verified Deployments
- EVO Nest0 Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- EVO Nest$4,399–$49,999
- TORUContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EVO Nest—
- TORU9 hrs
Availability Status
- EVO NestACTIVE
- TORUACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EVO Nest—
- TORU95 kg
Length
- EVO Nest—
- TORU102.4 mm
Width
- EVO Nest—
- TORU66.9 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EVO Nest—
- TORUperception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
Commercial
Price (USD)
- EVO Nest$4,399–$49,999
- TORUContact for quote
Warranty
- EVO Nest—
- TORU1 yrs
| EVO Nestamr-warehouseAutel Robotics 35.2Trust Score | TORUamr-warehouseMagazino 55.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $4,399–$49,999 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | 95 kg |
| Length (values differ) | — | 102.4 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 66.9 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | — | perception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,399–$49,999 | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: AMR Subtype, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
EVO Nest vs TORU compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.