Figure 02 vs HRP-2
Side-by-side comparison of Figure 02 (Figure AI) and HRP-2 (Kawada Industries) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
28.3Trust Score | HRP-2humanoidKawada Industries—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2002 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$26,970 | — |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 167.64 mm | 141.3 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 70 kg | 39 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 0.6 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | demo only |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | demo only |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, mild_incline | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 40 | 12 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 16 | 1 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | vendor demo | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | High-performance onboard computer (Details Awaiting Confirmation) | Pentium III control computer |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Tesla custom | Pentium III |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | none |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | Helix | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | single task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | teleoperation | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, teleoperation | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2.3 kWh | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | Yes |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Omniverse | — |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $26,970 | — |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $4,450 |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | BMW Spartanburg | — |
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, manufacturing, hazardous_env | hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Figure 02 vs HRP-2 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.
