Figure 02 vs Petman
Side-by-side comparison of Figure 02 (Figure AI) and Petman (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Figure 02humanoidFigure AI28.3Trust Score |  PetmanhumanoidBoston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | US | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 175 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 70 kg | 79.4 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | anthropomorphic torso |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 32 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 50 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 56 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | Custom PC |
| Programming (values differ) | — | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | auto dock |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | — | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | water and dustproof |
| Commercial | ||
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | HMGMA |
| Applications (values differ) | pick_and_place, material_handling, assembly, quality_control | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
About this comparison
Figure 02 vs Petman compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.