Side-by-side comparison of FR10 (法奥(苏州)机器人技术股份有限公司) and xMate CR35 (Beijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
FR10—
xMate CR35CNYear First Available
FR10—
xMate CR352025Verified Deployments
FR100 Deployments
xMate CR350 DeploymentsAvailability Status
FR10ACTIVE
xMate CR35ACTIVEDegrees of Freedom
FR10—
xMate CR356Force/Torque Sensing
FR10—
xMate CR35Yes FR10cobot法奥(苏州)机器人技术股份有限公司—Trust Score | xMate CR35cobotBeijing ROKAE Technology Co., Ltd.34.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Safety | ||
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Safety Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Programming Interface, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
FR10 vs xMate CR35 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.