Go1 Air vs QTrobot
Side-by-side comparison of Go1 Air (Hangzhou Yinfu Technology Co., LTD) and QTrobot (LuxAI) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Go1 AirhumanoidHangzhou Yinfu Technology Co., LTD—Trust Score |  QTrobothumanoidLuxAI13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$3,500 | US$7,476 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 400 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 26 kg | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.5 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 12 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 3* (4*1.43GHz 128Core 0.5T) | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, no_code_gui, voice | code_ros, code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, no_code_gui, voice | code_ros, code_python |
| ROS Support | Yes | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $3,500 | $7,476 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly, machine_tending, packaging, picking_and_placing | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Go1 Air vs QTrobot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.