HANK vs MATE-XT GO
Side-by-side comparison of HANK (GOGOA) and MATE-XT GO (Comau) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
HANKES
MATE-XT GOIT
Year First Available
- HANK2016
- MATE-XT GO2026
Verified Deployments
- HANK0 Deployments
- MATE-XT GO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HANK6 hrs
- MATE-XT GO—
Availability Status
- HANKACTIVE
- MATE-XT GOACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
| HANKexoskeletonGOGOA 27.9Trust Score | MATE-XT GOexoskeletonComau 48.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | ES | IT |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 6 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
HANK vs MATE-XT GO compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.