MiniCobo vs UR16e
Side-by-side comparison of MiniCobo (Shanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.) and UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 MiniCobocobotShanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  UR16ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2005 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$13,313 | US$47,500 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1 kg | 16 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 580 mm | 900 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 3 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 9.4 kg | 33.1 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | At any angle | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP40 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, EMC, RED), RoHS, KCs, GB 11291.1-2011, ISO 10218-1:2011 | ISO Class 5, ISO Class 6 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 0.5 hrs |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | drag_and_drop, code_ros |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | TCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, Profinet | Modbus TCP, PROFINET, Ethernet/IP |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,312.5 | $47,500 |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 3 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty
About this comparison
MiniCobo vs UR16e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.