MiniCobo vs UR30
Side-by-side comparison of MiniCobo (Shanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.) and UR30 (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 MiniCobocobotShanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  UR30cobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2005 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$13,313 | US$47,500 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1 kg | 30 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 580 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability | ±0.1 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 9.4 kg | 63.5 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | At any angle | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP40 | IP65 (Arm), IP44 (Control Box), IP54 (Teach Pendant) |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, EMC, RED), RoHS, KCs, GB 11291.1-2011, ISO 10218-1:2011 | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | TCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, Profinet | MODBUS TCP, EthernetNet/IP adapter, PROFINET, USB 2.0 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,312.5 | $47,500 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
MiniCobo vs UR30 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.