Kamigami vs Quince
Side-by-side comparison of Kamigami (Dash Robotics) and Quince (Chiba Institute of Technology and Tohoku University) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 KamigamideliveryDash Robotics13.3Trust Score | QuincedeliveryChiba Institute of Technology and Tohoku University 10.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $50 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 1 hrs | 2.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 0 kg | — |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 100x100x130 | — |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 1 hrs | 2.5 hrs |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 0.5 hrs | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload, Tray Count, Tray Capacity, Compartment Type, IP Rating, Navigation Type, Min Passable Width, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Auto Docking, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Floor Compatibility, Noise Level, Display Size, RaaS / Month, Warranty
About this comparison
Kamigami vs Quince compares two robots in the delivery category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.