KHR-3 vs Wildcat
Side-by-side comparison of KHR-3 (Kondo Kagaku) and Wildcat (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 KHR-3humanoidKondo Kagaku13.3Trust Score |  WildcathumanoidBoston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | JP | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$1,500 | US$24,999 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 0.1 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 40.105 cm | 1900 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 0 kg | 11 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 8.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 30 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | 56 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | RCB-4 microcontroller | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | RCB-4HV | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | none | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, bluetooth | — |
| Programming (values differ) | no_code_gui, teleoperation | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 0.1 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 1.5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | tethered | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | no_code_gui, teleoperation | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $1,500 | $24,999 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research | warehouse_transport, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
KHR-3 vs Wildcat compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.