KR 1240 vs UR12e
Side-by-side comparison of KR 1240 (Kassow Robots ApS) and UR12e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 KR 1240cobotKassow Robots ApS—Trust Score |  UR12ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | DK | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 18 kg | 16 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,800 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 0.5 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 38 kg | 33.3 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, mobile | floor |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | IP54 | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | wrist external |
| Power/Force Limiting (values differ) | — | 5.5 N |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop | teach_pendant, proprietary_app |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 12V/24V |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Profinet | MODBUS TCP, Ethernet/IP, PROFINET |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
KR 1240 vs UR12e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.