KR 20 R1810 CR vs KR 500 R2800-2 F
Side-by-side comparison of KR 20 R1810 CR (KUKA) and KR 500 R2800-2 F (KUKA) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 KR 20 R1810 CRindustrial-armKUKA10.0Trust Score |  KR 500 R2800-2 Findustrial-armKUKA—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | DE | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 500 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,813 mm | 2,800 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.04 mm | ±0.08 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 250 kg | 1,671 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | IP65 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | KR C5; KR C4 | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
KR 20 R1810 CR vs KR 500 R2800-2 F compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.